The Business Litigation Blog

To Mediate, or Not to Mediate: That is the Question

On November 30, 2012, I spoke at the National Business Institute (NBI) Business Contracts A to Z live seminar on breach of contract issues, including shareholder and LLC operating agreement cases and restrictive covenants.  Mediation was a topic that prompted some discussion with the audience and among the speakers.

Alternative dispute resolution is popular among those who draft contracts and mediation is one alternative way to resolve disputes.  Among the advantages specific to mediation include:

  1. You have a neutral non-party who can hear each of the parties out;

  2. There is not the stress of an actual trial because either party can decline to reach an agreement;

  3. Compromises can include non-case related principles (what some theorists call a win/win situation);

  4. A mediator's opinion on one or more of the issues under discussion might prevent a breakdown of the process or jump-start stalled negotiations;

  5. The proceedings are or can be confidential.   

There are a whole host of negotiation principles and techniques that can make a settlement more likely in a mediation. However, there are two main disadvantages to mediation:

  1. It is not usually free: you have to pay a mediator, whereas a judge is paid by the taxpayer (although there are small filing fees);

  2. It is difficult to gauge the sincerity of your opponent before you decide to participate: does he or she want to settle or are they trying to drag out the proceedings and increase the cost, intending to force you to file a lawsuit eventually anyway.  Related to this is whether your opponent wants an advance look at your evidence, so he or she can then scurry about developing contrary evidence or securing other witness testimony before the case is filed. 

Nothing prevents two parties in a contract from selecting in advance some person or organization to mediate a dispute, if that person or organization is willing to do so.  You might find someone you both trust who would not charge as much to mediate.  Otherwise, whether to agree to mediate in the event of a dispute over a written contract depends on whether you: could survive the delay (caused by mediator selection, scheduling, etc.), can afford the expense of a mediator and if are willing to go to court to present your case.

Click the link to view last week’s blog Patent Litigators: If You Need a Preliminary Injunction, Where You File Your Case Matters or check back next week for more business litigation tips. For more on patent litigation, click here or call (312) 223-1699 to speak with one of our Chicago litigation attorneys.

Post a comment

Comments closed

Real Time Web Analytics